MGE 216346 (02/28/2025)
MA denied for being over assets, despite rep’s significant health issues

DHA Case No. MGE 216346 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 28, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF

An individual is financially eligible for EBD Medicaid if the total value of all non-exempt liquid assets does not exceed $2,000. In this case, the petitioner’s daughter and representative failed to complete a renewal and then, months later, paid excess money to the nursing home, applied, and was ultimately approved for Institutional MA. ALJ Kate Schilling concluded the petitioner’s Medicaid eligibility was correctly denied for the months between, despite the daughter’s own significant physical and mental health challenges.


Have comments, corrections, or feedback? A fair hearing decision that should be published?
✉️ Email feedback.


Get summaries of new decisions emailed weekly:
📩 Subscribe to ELW Free

This decision was published with support from the Wisconsin chapter of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys and Krause Financial.

Preliminary Recitals

Pursuant to a petition filed on December 19, 2024, under Wis. Stat. § 49.45(5), and Wis. Admin. Code § HA 3.03(1), to review a decision by the Dodge County Human Services regarding Medical Assistance (MA), a hearing was held on February 4, 2025, by telephone.

The issue for determination is whether the petitioner is entitled to backdated long-term care Medicaid between March 1, 2024 and July 31, 2024.

There appeared at that time the following persons:

PARTIES IN INTEREST:

Petitioner:

Respondent:
Department of Health Services
1 West Wilson Street, Room 651
Madison, WI 53703
By: Chandler Zwieg
Dodge County Human Services
199 Cty Rd DF
Juneau, WI 53039

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:
Kate J. Schilling
Division of Hearings and Appeals

Findings of Fact

  1. Petitioner (CARES # —) is an 89 year old resident of Dane County. His daughter is his financial power of attorney and authorized representative for Medicaid.
  2. On January 15, 2024, the petitioner was sent a notice that stated that his Medicaid benefits would end on February 29, 2024, if he did not complete a renewal before that date.
  3. The renewal was not completed, and the petitioner’s Medicaid lapsed as of March 1, 2024.
  4. On August 30, 2024, the petitioner submitted an application for Institutional Medicaid and requested a three month backdate back to May 2024.
  5. The agency requested verification of the petitioner’s checking and savings accounts. The bank accounts reflected the following balances:
    Dates Balance
    4/15/24 – 5/12/24 $15,000.97
    5/13/24 – 6/12/24 $18,056.41
    6/13/24 – 7/14/24 $21,246.85
    7/15/24 – 8/12/24 $23,800.45
    8/29/24 – 9/12/24 $3,822.34
  6. On August 10, 2024, the petitioner’s daughter wrote a check to the nursing home for $23,168.55 to bring the petitioner’s bank account within the $2,000 limit and pay towards the outstanding balance.
  7. On October 1, 2024, the agency sent a notice to the petitioner stating that he was denied Medicaid and community waiver benefits “as of May 1, 2024” for being over the asset limit.
  8. On November 27, 2024, the agency sent a notice stating that the petitioner’s Medicaid benefits were approved and would be retroactive back to August 1, 2024.
  9. The agency determined that the petitioner has a Medicaid patient liability towards his cost of care of $3,180.44 per month in 2025.

Discussion

Medicaid is a state/federal program that provides health coverage for Wisconsin residents that are elderly, blind, or disabled (EBD) or receive Wisconsin Well Woman Medicaid. Medicaid is also known as Medical Assistance, MA, and Title 19. The EBD fiscal group’s assets must be within the appropriate categorically needy or medically needy asset limit before any member of that group can qualify for Medicaid. EBD fiscal groups who have assets in excess of the appropriate EBD medically needy asset limit are ineligible for Medicaid. See Medicaid Eligibility Handbook (MA Handbook) §§1.1.1 and 1.1.3.1., available online at http://www.emhandbooks.wi.gov/meh-ebd/.

An individual is financially eligible for EBD Medicaid if the total value of all non-exempt liquid assets does not exceed $2,000. Wis. Stats. §49.47(4)(b). The clear, unambiguous language of both Wis. Stat. §49.47(4)(b), and Wis. Admin. Code §DHS 103.08(1), states that eligibility cannot exist prior to the date on which all eligibility requirements are met. Until the actual date an individual’s liquid assets fall below $2,000, an individual is ineligible for Medicaid.

Generally speaking, a home, one vehicle, Medicaid-compliant burial assets, and personal belongings are exempt assets and do not count towards the asset limit. Life insurance policies are countable assets when the total face value exceeds $1,500. MA Handbook §16.7.5. Most other assets, including savings and checking bank accounts, are countable assets. MA Handbook §§ 16.1 and 16.7. Medicaid policy is that asset eligibility is determined on the last day of the month.

If he or she was asset eligible on the last day of the month, he or she is eligible for the whole month.

Medicaid Eligibility Handbook § 2.8.2. Therefore, by providing verification of eligibility as of the end of August, the petitioner was eligible and approved for Medicaid as of August 1, 2024. (The petitioner’s bank account balance was $3,822.34 at the end of August; however, his monthly income must be deducted from that balance as it counts as income in the month received, not as an asset. MA Handbook §§ 16.1 and 15.4.10. The petitioner receives $2,049 in Social Security retirement and $1,141.44 from a pension, for a total monthly income of $3,190.44.)

The petitioner’s daughter is his power of attorney for finances, and she handles her father’s Medicaid benefits as he is unable to do so himself. She submitted documentation from her own medical professionals relating to her physical and mental health challenges over the past year. She has significant mental health issues which are exacerbated by flareups with her multiple sclerosis, and required hospitalization last year. (Petitioner’s Exhibit 1) Furthermore, her neurologist stated that she “has trouble recognizing all aspects of time” as part of her psychiatric conditions. (Petitioner’s Exhibit 1.) In addition, she has had medication changes throughout 2024 which caused “some cognitive deficits and fogginess where she is forgetful and has difficulty remembering deadlines and appointments.” (Petitioner’s Exhibit 2.)

In her appeal letter, the petitioner’s daughter is requesting that I make an exception to the rules in order for Medicaid to pay for her father’s nursing home care between March 1, 2024 and July 31, 2024. I am unable to do so for two reasons. First, the request is untimely. Denials of Medicaid benefits must be appealed within 45 days of the date of the adverse action. Wis. Stat. § 49.45(5); Wis. Admin. Code § DHS 104.01(5)(a)3; Wis. Admin. Code § HA 3.05(3). The renewal notice was sent out on January 15, 2024, indicating that the renewal had to be completed in February or else benefits would end on February 29, 2024. While I do not have a copy of the termination notice as part of the hearing record, it was likely dated on or about February 19, 2024, at the latest, and would have had an appeal deadline of April 4, 2024. There is no record of an appeal being filed during that timeframe. Additionally, the notice sent to the petitioner on October 1, 2024, addresses the three month backdate request for her August 30, 2024 Medicaid application. This notice states that Medicaid was denied as of May 1, 2024 for being over the asset limit. This determination by the agency had to be appealed by November 18, 2024. The Division of Hearings and Appeals received this appeal on December 19, 2024, presumably in response to the November 27, 2024 notice; however, this most recent notice only references August 1, 2024 and forward.

Secondly, while the petitioner’s daughter has provided ample evidence of her physical and mental health challenges over the past year, I do not have authority to grant an exception in this case. There is no provision in the law for a late Medicaid appeal based on good cause, and there is no way for me to waive the asset limit requirements. “An agency or board created by the legislature has only those powers which are expressly or impliedly conferred on it by statute. Such statutes are generally strictly construed to preclude the exercise of power which is not expressly granted.” Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors, 83 Wis. 2d 316, 333, 265 N.W.2d 559 (1978) (citation omitted). Thus, as an administrative law judge, I do not have authority to make an exception or render a decision on the basis of fairness or equity.

The petitioner may wish to work with the income maintenance agency to request that the monthly Medicaid patient liability (cost of care) be offset to repay the outstanding balance at the nursing home. This was briefly discussed during the hearing and was referred to by the agency as a “deviation request.” If she has not already done this, the phone number to call the Capital Consortium is (888) 794-5556.

Conclusions of Law

The agency correctly denied the petitioner’s long-term care Medicaid between March 1, 2024 and July 31, 2024.

THEREFORE, it is

Ordered

That the petition is hereby dismissed.

[Request for a rehearing and appeal to court instructions omitted.]

 

If you found this decision useful, sign up for my email newsletter. You’ll get summaries of newly published decisions and a PDF of useful information on estate recovery.