Tag: 4.2 Benefits

DHA Case No. FCP 217068 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Apr. 7, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Aservice that is “duplicative with respect to other services being provided” is not medically necessary. In this case, the petitioner attended adult day services with a certain provider while living with her siblings for several years. But when […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 216051 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 28, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Whether Family Care must cover placement in an Adult Family Home (AFH) or other group home setting depends on the general criteria of medical necessity and cost-effectivness, among others. In this case, the petitioner lived in an apartment […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 216762 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 19, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Around 2017 DHS instituted a policy that a caregiver should not be approved for more than 40 hours per week of paid services, including SHC covered by IRIS and other forms of caregiving such as personal care worker […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 216860 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 18, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF IRIS participants must pay their providers a “usual and customary rate.” In this case, the petitioner sought an increase in the daily rate of his adult day services provider from $157.50 to $168.50. Noting the difference between the customary […] Read more

DHA Case No. MPA 216849 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 14, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Orthodontia is generally not an MA-covered service, but must be covered for recipients under age 21 if the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) health assessment and evaluation indicates that it is needed. Finding exceptional circumstances […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 216141 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 13, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF IRIS participants may be involuntarily disenrolled for failure to spend the funds in their budget. In this case, the petitioner was repeatedly warned that her failure to spend her IRIS budget could result in disenrollment, and she ultimately […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWK 215882 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 3, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In the CLTS program, the County Waiver Agency plays a limited role in qualifying and authorizing participants’ chosen service providers, including checking certifications and licensure and conducting a background check. In this case, the county denied the petitioner’s […] Read more

DHA Case No. MPP 215826 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 16, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If a Medicaid recipient knowingly obtains health care that exceeds program limits or is not medically necessary, the Department may enroll the recipient in the “lock-in program,” which limits the recipient to one prescriber and one pharmacy for […] Read more

DHA Case No. MNP 216025 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 13, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Fair hearings allow recipients to appeal department actions that result in the denial, discontinuation, termination, suspension, or reduction of benefits. They are not for lodging complaints against providers. In this case, the petitioner filed a fair hearing that […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 218226 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Oct. 30, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Home modifications may be an allowable service covered by IRIS if they are needed, safe, and cost-effective. In this case, the petitioner needed a way to access the first floor of her home but could not safely use […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 217755 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jul. 11, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care MCOs must provide services that reasonably and effectively address all of the member’s long-term needs and outcomes while being cost-effective. In this case, the petitioner’s MCO sought to end his placement in an Adult Family Home, […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 216813 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals May 9, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The IRIS waiver requires IRIS Consultant Agencies (ICAs) to monitor participants’ health and safety, address health and safety concerns with the participant, and ultimately disenroll participants when health and safety concerns remain despite remediation efforts. In this case, […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 217415 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals May 5, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The Department may disenroll IRIS participants if it cannot develop a plan that ensures the participant’s health and safety. In this case, the petitioner’s behavior support plan—staff call 911 and seek refuge in their cars if he gets […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 215537 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 24, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care services must generally be from appropriate and qualified providers, be fair and safe, serve to maintain community connections, and be cost effective. In this sympathetic case, the petitioner—a competent 43-year-old man with muscular dystrophy, severe respiratory […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 215921 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 22, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Providers are generally not allowed to restrain MA participants, but this rule can be waived after an application to the Department. In this case, the petitioner had a waiver that expired June 21, 2024. Although his mother reapplied […] Read more