Tag: 4.1 Verification

DHA Case No. BCS 216058 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 14, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When verifying income with BadgerCare Plus, the agency must “advise the applicant of the specific verification required.” If the applicant “is able to produce required verifications but refuses or fails to do so,” the benefits will be denied […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 215656 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 27, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A notice requesting verification must be in writing, specific as to the verification required, and allow a minimum of 20 days to provide it. A notice of adverse action must be mailed at least 10 calendar days before […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 215161 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 18, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be eligible for BadgerCare Plus, a person must meet certain financial and non-financial requirements, including verification of income for self-employment. In this case, the petitioner verified her self-employment income with a partial, unsigned copy of her tax […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 214773 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Nov. 1, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency is required to verify a Medicaid applicant’s income and assets, including potential divestments. In this case, the petitioner reported a $5,000 transfer to his sister for “paid bills” and his bank statements showed withdrawals of […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 29, 2017) (DHS) (proposed decision on cost motion) ↓ Download PDF A petitioner who wins a contested fair hearing is entitled to costs (including attorney fees) unless the agency was “substantially justified” or special circumstances would make the award unjust. In this case, the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals September 27, 2016) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Although medical assistance applicants must verify relevant information, an agency cannot deny benefits if the applicant is incapable of obtaining the verification or needs help getting it. In this case, a prior fair hearing had determined that […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 157892 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 30, 2014) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF County agencies may not over-verify; they may only require the verification needed to determine eligibility. In this case, the agency requested verification of an old family trust that had been depleted and the value of a Wispact […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212224 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 3, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment may be backdated if agency error causes a delay in enrollment. In this case, the ADRC completed the functional screen on October 31 but did not notify IM of the referral until January 10. […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 212813 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 28, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment may be backdated if agency error causes a delay in enrollment. In this case, the agency requested verification of a new funeral trust—which the petitioner had created but not reported during the pandemic—during a […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 213476 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 8, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency must give individuals adequate written notice of verification requests. In this case, the requests “became numerous and internally inconsistent,” confusing the petitioner. ALJ Kenneth Duren concluded the agency failed to follow proper verification procedures […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 212166 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 10, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency must give individuals adequate written notice of verification requests. In this case, the agency sought to verify whether the petitioner was residing with her estranged spouse. The notice, however, only requested verification of “people […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 212098 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 26, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment can be backdated if agency error by the ADRC or IM causes unreasonable delay. In this case, the petitioner claimed to have sent verification of assets being below $2,000 in December—via ACCESS and, a […] Read more

DHA Case No. MAP 212440 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 16, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Applicants for Medicaid are given at least 20 days from the date of a request to provide verification, and benefits may only be denied if the applicant has the power to produce the verification. In this case, […] Read more

DHA Case No. MQB 212321 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 2, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Income Maintenance agencies must assist Medicaid applicants and members with verification if asked or if they have difficulty in obtaining it. In this case, the petitioner—a 72-year old woman—faxed the required verification of her life insurance, but […] Read more

DHA Case No. MAP 211494 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 6, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be exempt homestead property, the property must serve as the individual’s primary place of residence. In this case, the petitioner owned real estate worth $25,000 and claimed he lived there in a tent, providing documents and […] Read more