DHA Case No. MGE 215302 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jun. 2, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The agency is required to verify income, assets, and divestments, both at application and at renewals. The applicant or member has the primary responsibility to provide verification and resolve questionable information. In this case, the petitioner’s authorized representatives […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 216012 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 18, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A notice is not adequate if it does not expressly identify the program for which benefits are denied. Also, an application cannot be denied merely because the applicant lacks the power to produce verification. In this case, the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MAP 216062 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 4, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The agency may not require one particular type of verification when various types are adequate and available. In this case, the petitioner owned a newly incorporated business with no previous tax filings. Instead of submitting a self-employment income […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 149517 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jul. 26, 2013) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Money spent for fair market value is generally not a divestment, but the agency may require verification of large cash withdrawals. In this case, the petitioner’s daughter attempted to verify $22,219.40 in cash withdrawals with a spreadsheet. ALJ […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 147776 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jul. 12, 2013) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The divestment penalty period for an Institutional MA applicant begins on the first date the person (1) is institutionalized, (2) has applied for Medicaid, and (3) is otherwise eligible for Medicaid. In this case, the petitioner applied on […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 215665 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 20, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, agencies must process Medicaid applications within 30 days, allow at least 20 days for additional verifications, and may not request excessive or unnecessary verification. In this case, the petitioner applied for Family Care on July 16. […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 214557 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 15, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Medicaid participants are entitled to proper notice before disenrollment. In this case, the petitioner’s deadline to provide verification for a renewal was March 28, 2024. Her authorized representative tried to call IM twice that day but did not […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 212301 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Sep. 16, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The agency can deny Medicaid when the applicant or recipient is able to produce required verifications but refuses or fails to do so. In this case, the petitioner failed to verify, at his renewal, one of his vehicles, […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 216058 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 14, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When verifying income with BadgerCare Plus, the agency must “advise the applicant of the specific verification required.” If the applicant “is able to produce required verifications but refuses or fails to do so,” the benefits will be denied […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 215656 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 27, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A notice requesting verification must be in writing, specific as to the verification required, and allow a minimum of 20 days to provide it. A notice of adverse action must be mailed at least 10 calendar days before […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 215161 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 18, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be eligible for BadgerCare Plus, a person must meet certain financial and non-financial requirements, including verification of income for self-employment. In this case, the petitioner verified her self-employment income with a partial, unsigned copy of her tax […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 214773 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Nov. 1, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency is required to verify a Medicaid applicant’s income and assets, including potential divestments. In this case, the petitioner reported a $5,000 transfer to his sister for “paid bills” and his bank statements showed withdrawals of […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 29, 2017) (DHS) (proposed decision on cost motion) ↓ Download PDF A petitioner who wins a contested fair hearing is entitled to costs (including attorney fees) unless the agency was “substantially justified” or special circumstances would make the award unjust. In this case, the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals September 27, 2016) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Although medical assistance applicants must verify relevant information, an agency cannot deny benefits if the applicant is incapable of obtaining the verification or needs help getting it. In this case, a prior fair hearing had determined that […] Read more