DHA Case No. MRA 213308 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jul. 31, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A Community Waivers member in Group B or B Plus may use spousal improverishment rules to give income to his or her spouse as an “institutionalized person,” but Group A members are excluded from that definition. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 213191 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jul. 15, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Community Waivers members in Groups B and B Plus may use spousal improverishment rules to give income to their spouses, but Group A members may not. In this case, the petitioner was enrolled in Group B in 2019 […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212695 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 24, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Continuing enrollment in IRIS requires payment of the cost share. In this case, the petitioner had $1,102.50 of unpaid cost share that she argued was discharged in a bankruptcy court order. ALJ Teresa Perez concluded she lacked […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 211474 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 20, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF IRIS Consultant Agencies (ICAs) must now help participants maintain MA eligibility, including monitoring and reporting any medical or remedial expenses. In this case, the petitioner had more than $2,000 in privately paid personal care expenses that were […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 209188 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals September 5, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An appeal of a negative MA decision must be filed, at most, within 90 days (for most decisions it’s 45 days). In this case, the petitioner’s cost share was increased by notices effective September 1, 2022 and […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 209688 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals October 19, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A recipient of IRIS must usually pay a cost share after deducting a basic needs allowance, a special housing amount, health insurance premiums, and certain out-of-pocket medical/remedial expenses. In this case, the petitioner had fairly high income […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206604 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 5, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care members in Group A (due to eligibility for MAPP, for example) do not have a cost share. In this complex case, the petitioner lost MAPP eligibility when her child turned 18 and her fiscal test […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 208218 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 12, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Cost share reductions are effective the month of the change report, even if the actual change in income or expense was earlier. In this case, the petitioner enrolled in Family Care with a cost share effective November […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 208193 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals October 2, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When DHS increases a member’s cost share, it has the burden of proof on appeal. In this rather messy case, it was clear that the cost share should have been lower but it was not clear whose […] Read more

DHA Case No. MPC-13/78330 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 1, 2006) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF In Community Waivers cases, countable income is first used in eligibility determinations to place an applicant into a group; then the post-eligibility cost share is calculated based on the formula for that group. In this case, the petitioner’s […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 155113 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 14, 2014) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF The issue in this case was whether overnight caregiver costs counted as a remedial expense, which could be deducted from income before determining the cost share. The agency argued these could not be a remedial expense, relying […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 197076 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 28, 2020) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF In this case, the petitioner had a life estate in two properties, one in California and one in Wisconsin. Both were rented. But Dane County DHS did not reduce the petitioner’s cost share to allow her to pay […] Read more