DHA Case No. MDV 156359 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals May 9, 2014) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Payments to relatives for care and services are not considered divestments if the services directly benefited the institutionalized person, compensation was reasonable, and, if the total exceeds 10% of the Community Spouse Asset Share, there is a preexisting […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 138130 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jun. 27, 2012) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Transfers for fair market value are not divestments. In this case, the petitioner was a 96-year-old woman living in northern Wisconsin who had named her daughter as her financial agent. After she was admitted to a nursing home, […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 133314 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Oct. 4, 2011) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 132474 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Aug. 24, 2011) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 13/78679 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 16, 2007) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If an institutionalized person is paying a relative for care and services, then the payment must not exceed reasonable compensation for the services provided. In this case, the petitioner paid a lump sum of $85,013.02 to her adult […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 152549 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 9, 2013) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 215615 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 6, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay a relative for services in amounts exceeding 10% of the maximum Community Spouse Asset Share requires a written, notarized contract at the time the services were provided. In this case, petitioners were a married couple, both […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 214370 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Oct. 22, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The transfer of an exempt asset (except a homestead) is not a divestment. In this case, the petitioner bought a car—though she could not drive herself—that her son used to transport her to medical appointments. About seven months […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 68/86274 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Apr. 3, 1995) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF It is generally a divestment to transfer an asset while receiving less than its fair market value in cash, services, or other forms of payment. In this case, the petitioner and her husband sold their homestead real estate […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 13/10761 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 19, 1997) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF It is generally a divestment to transfer an asset while receiving less than its fair market value in cash, services, or other forms of payment. In this case, the petitioner’s spouse sold their non-homestead real estate for $20,590 […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 203910 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 23, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If payments to a relative for services exceed 10% of the maximum CSAS, the MEH requires a notarized agreement. In this case, the petitioner had an agreement to pay her daughters $500 per month, but it was […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 207202 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 23, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A transfer for less than fair market value is a divestment, and payments to relatives often also need a notarized contract or lease. In this case, the petitioner’s son and POA used the proceeds from selling her […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 199858 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals December 4, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Divestment is a transfer of non-exempt resources for less than fair market value. This case involved two potential divestments when the petitioner’s house was sold to her daughter and daughter’s boyfriend: (1) the boyfriend was paid $40,534.37 […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 170367 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 2, 2016) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF This decision discussed two issues at some length. First, whether payments to the petitioner’s daughter were divestments; and second, whether the petitioner’s former home, now rented at fair market value, was countable. On the first issue, the […] Read more