Tag: 3.3.07 Payments to relatives

DHA Case No. MDV 40/18587 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals Dec. 16, 1997) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF In general, a transfer for fair market value is not a divestment. In this case, the petitioner spent $52,074 on repairs to his home, in which he had retained a life estate, after he was institutionalized. The […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 171354 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 28, 2016) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Payments to relatives for care and services are not considered divestments if the services directly benefited the institutionalized person, compensation was reasonable, and, if the total exceeds 10% of the Community Spouse Asset Share, there is a preexisting […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 156359 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals May 9, 2014) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Payments to relatives for care and services are not considered divestments if the services directly benefited the institutionalized person, compensation was reasonable, and, if the total exceeds 10% of the Community Spouse Asset Share, there is a preexisting […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 138130 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jun. 27, 2012) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Transfers for fair market value are not divestments. In this case, the petitioner was a 96-year-old woman living in northern Wisconsin who had named her daughter as her financial agent. After she was admitted to a nursing home, […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 133314 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Oct. 4, 2011) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 132474 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Aug. 24, 2011) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 13/78679 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 16, 2007) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If an institutionalized person is paying a relative for care and services, then the payment must not exceed reasonable compensation for the services provided. In this case, the petitioner paid a lump sum of $85,013.02 to her adult […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 152549 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 9, 2013) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay relatives for services while avoiding divestment, a written and notarized agreement that exists at the time the services are provided is required if the total payment exceeds 10% of the community spouse asset share. In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 215615 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Jan. 6, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To pay a relative for services in amounts exceeding 10% of the maximum Community Spouse Asset Share requires a written, notarized contract at the time the services were provided. In this case, petitioners were a married couple, both […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 214370 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Oct. 22, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The transfer of an exempt asset (except a homestead) is not a divestment. In this case, the petitioner bought a car—though she could not drive herself—that her son used to transport her to medical appointments. About seven months […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 13/10761 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 19, 1997) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF It is generally a divestment to transfer an asset while receiving less than its fair market value in cash, services, or other forms of payment. In this case, the petitioner’s spouse sold their non-homestead real estate for $20,590 […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 203910 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 23, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If payments to a relative for services exceed 10% of the maximum CSAS, the MEH requires a notarized agreement. In this case, the petitioner had an agreement to pay her daughters $500 per month, but it was […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 207202 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 23, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A transfer for less than fair market value is a divestment, and payments to relatives often also need a notarized contract or lease. In this case, the petitioner’s son and POA used the proceeds from selling her […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 198612 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 24, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Any transfer of resources for less than fair market value is generally a divestment, but there is an exception if the resource was transferred “exclusively for some other purpose than to become eligible for MA.” In this […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 199858 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals December 4, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Divestment is a transfer of non-exempt resources for less than fair market value. This case involved two potential divestments when the petitioner’s house was sold to her daughter and daughter’s boyfriend: (1) the boyfriend was paid $40,534.37 […] Read more